Russia’s thwarting of precision Western weapons in Ukraine shows the value of things like old-fashioned, unguided artillery, European general says
As the conflict in Ukraine continues to rage on, military experts are taking note of a peculiar development: Russia’s impressive ability to counter Western precision-guided weapons. Despite the advanced technology and sophistication of Western weapons, Russian forces have been able to successfully neutralize them, leading some to question the value of precision-guided munitions.
In an interview, a European general made a striking statement: “It’s time to recognize that old-fashioned, unguided artillery is still a force to be reckoned with. Russia’s ability to thwart our precision-guided weapons has been a wake-up call. We need to rethink our reliance on these expensive and technically complex systems.”
The general’s remarks come as a surprise to many, as precision-guided weapons have been touted as a game-changer in modern warfare. These weapons use advanced sensors, GPS, and computer algorithms to accurately target enemy positions. However, Russia’s successes in Ukraine have demonstrated that even the most advanced precision-guided weapons can be vulnerable to countermeasures.
One of the main reasons for this vulnerability is the sheer number of targets Russia has to attack. Ukraine has an extensive network of military infrastructure, including command centers, air defense systems, and communication networks. This presents a challenging problem for precision-guided weapons, as they often require a high degree of accuracy to hit their targets. In contrast, unguided artillery can be used to saturate a target area with numerous shells, making it difficult for enemy forces to determine which shell is the effective one.
Another factor is the effectiveness of Russian electronic warfare capabilities. Russia has invested heavily in electronic warfare, including digital jamming, which can disrupt the signals used by precision-guided weapons. This has made it difficult for Western forces to maintain accurate targeting data, and has forced them to rely on less accurate, unguided weapons.
The European general’s comments are not meant to disparage the potential of precision-guided weapons entirely. However, they do highlight the importance of a balanced military strategy that includes both advanced technology and traditional, unguided artillery. As the conflict in Ukraine continues to evolve, it is clear that adaptability and flexibility will be key to success.
In conclusion, Russia’s ability to thwart Western precision-guided weapons in Ukraine has demonstrated the value of old-fashioned, unguided artillery. While precision-guided weapons remain an important tool in modern warfare, they should not be relied upon as the sole solution. Instead, military forces must adopt a balanced approach that incorporates both advanced technology and traditional, time-tested tactics.