Misconceptions About Reading Acquisition: Everything You Need to Know
Reading is one of the key life skills that everyone must master to thrive in today’s world. Acquiring this ability takes time and is fraught with misunderstandings. In his book “Reading Instruction that Works,” Michael Pressley discusses some of these myths. I’ll go through a couple of the things he brought up.
Be aware of the following myths since they can have an impact on how reading as a talent is taught. The items on the list are not in any particular sequence.
- The most common fallacy about reading is that it is a natural process—that if a kid is exposed to a reading-friendly environment, they will learn to read. Reading is not a natural activity, which is why it is necessary to teach it in the first place. Whereas language learning occurs naturally, reading acquisition needs expert instruction. Many schools and reading institutes spend money to hire and train the greatest educators to teach reading. So, no, exposing a child to literature from a young age is insufficient.
- Reading programs are frequently touted as useful and successful in bridging reading gaps. There are several reading programs available, but none are one-size-fits-all. Rather than spending a lot of money on activities, schools should concentrate on selecting the greatest educators and training them to acquire advanced skills and a diagnostic approach.
- Closely connected to the preceding fallacy is the belief that children require some time to learn to read at their speed. This is a very harmful notion since it puts children in jeopardy. Unaddressed reading gaps that began at a young age will only become wider as they grow older.
- There will always be a few kids who are a little behind or are unable to keep up with the rest of the class in any given reading lesson. To address this, educators and schools propose specialized teaching for a limited time to assist kids in “catching up.” These one-on-one sessions are normally helpful, but research has shown that when students return to regular classroom education, the benefits do not last.
- Because times have evolved, so must teaching approaches and curricular material. Literacy has been and will continue to be an important skill to master. Educators, on the other hand, must be prepared to teach children with considerably shorter attention spans.
- The reading curriculum will be taught to the children. The curriculum for any topic is intended to give educators a road map for determining what to teach their pupils. Despite their greatest efforts, even the best educators can only do so much to ensure that the student has retained the lessons. Rather than focusing on the teachings outlined in the curriculum or syllabus, educators should focus on the students’ learning.
Last Thoughts
Reading is a basic life skill that everyone should be able to perform. It needs the abilities of a well-trained teacher to support this process. To properly teach reading to children, the instructor must be imaginative as well as educated about the many teaching approaches that would best fit the students’ requirements. Schools must give educators the required training and continuing education so that they can assist as many pupils as feasible.